The Ethnic Hypocrisy Of Anti-BNP’ers
*****QUESTION: There is no such thing as a British people. The history of Britain is one of continued mass immigration, and we are therefore a mongrel people. What is happening now is just a continuation of that history. ANSWER: Not at all the scientific definition of an indigenous species is a species originally present in an area. Therefore the indigenous British genotype is that created at the time when Britain was created as a nation, around 1000 years ago. Britain then was made up of the descendants of the original Celts, together with Nordic (or Viking) people [from Norway, Sweden and Denmark], Germanic people [Angles and Saxons], Normans [who were largely former Vikings] and the Romans. The point therefore is that the indigenous British are a fusion of genetically similar Northern and Western European peoples all coming from within a few hundred miles of each other. While more recent migrants from these areas can be easily assimilated therefore given their compatible genotype, the present immigration from the Third World is a very different matter. Species which move into a new area and become established there are called colonisers. Britain is therefore being colonised by foreign populations which are changing the nature of Britain. [To understand this it is useful to consider a non-emotional parallel: the red and grey squirrel. The red squirrel is the indigenous one, the grey one the coloniser. The grey squirrel will never be termed indigenous, no matter how long …
March 12th, 2010 at 2:28 pm
Your cause is a joke. Your Cause is the same cause as the Nazi Eugenicists cause, and your disgraced party will get their assholes beaten in by the Muslims.
From a white-man who lives in Asia, and is a Catholic. Fuck the BNP.
March 12th, 2010 at 3:14 pm
VOTE BNP – goodbye corrupt New World Order!
March 12th, 2010 at 3:33 pm
ANY MAN THAT PUTS A RELIGION BASED ON THEORY AND LIES ABIVE HUMANITY IS A TOTAL SPASTICK.AND A LIGHT TANNED ONE AT THAT.MAINLY.
all follow me and read my ideology.You will end up happy in the arms of a lesbion who has just made a bollywood film who will tell you,you are in paradise and that she is a virgin after you have just watched her being banged out by a big fat pig.
Thank you very much.
March 12th, 2010 at 4:29 pm
@angryafghan A new Islam is coming. The true Islam that is compatible with the culture and values of each separate ethnicity. Allah has made the separate ethnicities and multiracialism is truly UNISLAMIC. Sharia is supposed to be local rule and never forced onto people by foreigners.
March 12th, 2010 at 4:42 pm
@Sonnypjim09 No, what I said was perfectly fine. He’s not a supporter of the cause, there are many fake accounts out there that put out “Real” views of the BNP, when in fact they’re just trying to make us look bad. Only muslims type like that, he’s a disgrace to our cause.
March 12th, 2010 at 5:33 pm
Talk “correctly” don’t you mean?
Stop in-fighting, he’s a supporter of the cause and riddance of Islam, so do not pick on others because of their spellings; concentrate on more upholding matters.
Thanks.
March 12th, 2010 at 6:23 pm
@Puma4only gtfo youre an idiot. You can’t talk properly. English people talk properly, its obvious your account is fake.
March 12th, 2010 at 7:00 pm
excellent!
March 12th, 2010 at 7:37 pm
me agree wiv u. we throw religion out. we hav beter country.
March 12th, 2010 at 7:39 pm
Well I certainly have no such problem with seperating ideology and ethnicity, but on the other hand, most of the islamic extremists in the UK do tend to be of Pakistani or Somali origin, so to highlight this fact would certainly not make someone a racist.
Secularism is the only way forward I suspect, but that would mean pissing on the Christian values that have forged this nation & continent over the last 1500 years. Alternatively, islam should be banned or kerbed, no burkhas, no minarets etc
March 12th, 2010 at 8:23 pm
I agree with most of what has been said here about Islam, or “Islamo-fascism” to use my preferred epithet. However I find that many people have difficulty separating ideology from ethnicity.
Churchill sums it up perfectly, most of us are by now familiar with the rigidity of Islamic doctrine and its failure to adapt, making it incompatible with western values and leaving its adherents isolated from society at large.
March 12th, 2010 at 9:11 pm
@PrinceBen: That’s a semantic argument, the definition of the term “race” is not as rigid as you think. Take, for example this dictionary definition: “5. any people united by common history, language, cultural traits, etc.: the Dutch race.”
March 12th, 2010 at 10:05 pm
Da brothers say dat da blonde women wiv big tits r dumb n make no good babies. so da bothers say those women only good 4 gang rape n pissin sex.
March 12th, 2010 at 10:36 pm
@Puma4 you are kidding tho – you know well that black men like the blonde white women with the big tits. So its no shame if I iz dat. except I kind of fancy my own kind and stuff
March 12th, 2010 at 11:24 pm
@NorseMaiden
I not white supremachoist. u r. Me speak lik bmp chavs.
u lik big blak dicks, init? sad ur not blak.
March 12th, 2010 at 11:57 pm
@Puma4 are you a “white supremacist” trying to make nignogs look bad. They don’t talk like that you know. It’s a racist stereotype.
March 13th, 2010 at 12:24 am
@NorseMaiden ur not white, cunt.
ur just da woman who lik big blak dicks, but who hav no melanin. so u morne
March 13th, 2010 at 12:39 am
@NorseMaiden No, da brothers say dat dere were blak men ere in britian after da romans came. u r stupid cunt.
March 13th, 2010 at 12:51 am
yes he hates all muslims cause some muslims killed his family. he joins the BNP because they hate Muslims, its pretty simple and not very good PR.
The change was forced upon them and as such is seen as nothing but survival, it changes nothing about the party.
I don’t think the tables have turned at all, anyone with a brain can still see what they are.
concerned about what?
March 13th, 2010 at 1:23 am
no a thriving black community, as in there were a lot of black people here, mostly from north africa and such. they were not a massive propotion but they were here and they lived here and bred with each other and with the locals.
March 13th, 2010 at 1:46 am
yeah probably if they were exluding him from something becuase he was white, depends really on the situation, if the idea to going to the meetings was to pass some right or ritual and the white fella did this and they wouldn’t let him in then yes racism, if they didn’t let him in cause he hadn’t done the rite/ritual then no. pretty simple, if you do not allow someone to do something or be something becuase of the colour of their skin (no matter the colour of your skin) you are being racist.
March 13th, 2010 at 2:45 am
@DarthFulton what about if a white American supports the cause of the Native Americans. What if they say: that’s great, thanks but you know that doesn’t make you one of us, and sorry but you can’t come to our tribal gatherings.
Would that be evil racism?
March 13th, 2010 at 3:08 am
@DarthFulton Oh no there wasn’t thriving black communities in Britain for hundreds of years. There were no black communities until the Windrush brought them in the 1950s.
March 13th, 2010 at 3:57 am
I’d rather describe him as a man who has experienced first hand the militant hand of islam and it’s agressiom. I’d also like to add out that the constitutional change is a major step forward for the party IMHO.
The establishment and all left wingers were assuming the party would implode or be made illegal after they were rightly challenged over their membership criteria, how the tables have been turned.
I’m not a BNP member by the way, just a BNP voter and very concerned UK citizen.
March 13th, 2010 at 4:01 am
Singh is noit a good poster boy for your party, a sikh who is joining cause he hates muslims and knows that the BNP hate muslims. Also being forced to change your constitution changes nothing about the party. Still racist, still can’t produce any decent policy, still laughable and so on